4.7 Article

A BAC transgenic mouse model reveals neuron subtype-specific effects of a Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus (GEFS plus ) mutation

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 91-102

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.04.007

Keywords

Sodium channel; SCN1A; GEFS; SMEI; Epilepsy; Mutation

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [NS046484, NS051834, NS48336]
  2. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation [5-FY02-250]
  3. McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
  4. European Integrated Project EPICURE (M.M.)
  5. Italian Telethon [GGP07277]
  6. Epilepsy Foundation
  7. AFIP
  8. FAPESP [07-50534-5, 98/14303-3]
  9. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [98/14303-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel SCN1A are responsible for a number of seizure disorders including Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus (GEFS+) and Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy (SMEI). To determine the effects of SCN1A mutations on channel function in vivo, we generated a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mouse model that expresses the human SCN1A GEFS+ mutation, R1648H. Mice with the R1648H mutation exhibit a more severe response to the proconvulsant kainic acid compared with mice expressing a control Scn1a transgene. Electrophysiological analysis of dissociated neurons from mice with the R1648H mutation reveal delayed recovery from inactivation and increased use-dependent inactivation only in inhibitory bipolar neurons, as well as a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation only in excitatory pyramidal neurons. These results demonstrate that the effects of SCN1A mutations are cell type-dependent and that the R1648H mutation specifically leads to a reduction in interneuron excitability. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available