4.5 Article

Hippocampus-specific deficiency in RNA editing of GluA2 in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 1785-1791

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.018

Keywords

RNA editing; ADAR; Glutamate; Alzheimer's disease; ApoE; Neurodegeneration; AMPA; GluA2; Postmortem; Hippocampus; Caudate; Primer extension

Funding

  1. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  2. Molecular Basis of Human Disease I-CORE (Israeli Centers of Research Excellence)
  3. Israel Science Foundation [365/06, 1942/08]
  4. Israel Ministry for Science and Technology (Scientific Infrastructure Program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a base recoding process within precursor messenger RNA, catalyzed by members of the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) family. A notable example occurs at the Q/R site of the a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid glutamate receptor subunit GluA2. Abnormally, low editing at this site leads to excessive calcium influx and cell death. We studied hippocampus and caudate samples from Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and age-matched healthy controls, using direct sequencing and a high accuracy primer-extension technique to assess RNA editing at the Q/R GluA2 site. Both techniques revealed lower, more variable RNA editing in AD, specific to the hippocampus and the GluA2 site. Deficient editing also characterized the hippocampus of apolipoprotein epsilon 4 allele carriers, regardless of clinical diagnosis. In AD, messenger RNA expression of neuronal markers was decreased in the hippocampus, and expression of the Q/ R-site editing enzyme ADAR2 was decreased in caudate. These findings provide a link between neuro-degenerative processes and deficient RNA editing of the GluA2 Q/ R site, and may contribute to both diagnosis and treatment of AD. (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available