4.5 Article

Identification of C9orf72 repeat expansions in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia in mainland China

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.001

Keywords

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Frontotemporal dementia; C9orf72; Hexanucleotide repeats; Risk haplotype

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2011CB510000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81171068]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The GGGGCC repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene was recently identified as a major cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in white populations. To estimate the frequency of hexanucleotide repeats in patients with ALS and FTD from mainland China, we screened for C9orf72 in a cohort of 128 patients and 150 control subjects using the repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction method. We observed pathogenic repeat expansions in a family with ALS-FTD and in a patient with sporadic FTD. In the family with ALS-FTD, the proband and the 2 asymptomatic siblings exhibited C9orf72 repeat expansions, and the clinical feature of the proband was characterized by pure motor syndrome with no cognitive impairment. The patient with sporadic FTD presented primarily with deteriorating behavior and mental status. Genotype analysis revealed that the proband shared the previously reported 20-single nucleotide polymorphism risk haplotype, whereas the patient with sporadic FTD carried all single nucleotide polymorphisms except rs2814707-A. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report 2 C9orf72 mutation patients in mainland China, and they shared the similar risk haplotype identified in white populations, suggesting that ALS and FTD associated with C9orf72 mutation was probably derived from a single founder. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available