4.5 Article

The evaluation of polyglutamine repeats in autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.01.022

Keywords

Trinucleotide repeat diseases; Parkinson's disease; Polyglutamine; Intermediate length; Ataxin-2

Funding

  1. Strategic Research Foundation [80218510, 21591098]
  2. Young Scientists [22790829, 23791003]
  3. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Science and Technology [23111003, 23129506]
  4. Research Committee of CNS Degenerative Diseases and Perry Syndrome [22140901]
  5. Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [20261501, 22140501]
  6. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461291, 25860725, 23791003, 23129506, 22790829] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the contributions of various polyglutamine (polyQ) disease genes to Parkinson's disease (PD). We compared the distributions of polyQ repeat lengths in 8 common genes (ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, CACNA1A, ATXN7, TBP, ATN1, and HTT) in 299 unrelated patients with autosomal dominant PD (ADPD) and 329 normal controls. We also analyzed the possibility of genetic interactions between ATXN1 and ATXN2, ATXN2 and ATXN3, and ATXN2 and CACNA1A. Intermediate-length polyQ expansions (> 24 Qs) of ATXN2 were found in 7 ADPD patients and no controls (7/299 = 2.34% and 0/329 = 0%, respectively; p = 0.0053 < 0.05/8 after Bonferroni correction). These patients showed typical L-DOPA-responsive PD phenotypes. Conversely, no significant differences in polyQ repeat lengths were found between the ADPD patients and the controls for the other 7 genes. Our results may support the hypothesis that ATXN2 polyQ expansion is a specific predisposing factor for multiple neurodegenerative diseases. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available