4.5 Article

Mutations in protein N-arginine methyltransferases are not the cause of FTLD-FUS

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.04.004

Keywords

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration; FUS; FET proteins; PRMT1; PRMT3; PRMT8; Protein N-arginine methyltransferase

Funding

  1. Mayo Benefactor
  2. Mayo Foundation
  3. National Institute of Health [P50 AG016574, R01 NS065782, R01 AG026251, R01 AG037491, P50 AG023501]
  4. The Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia Research
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A-132864]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [74580]
  7. Pacific Alzheimer's Research Foundation [C06-01]
  8. Sydney Brain Bank
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  10. The University of New South Wales
  11. Neuroscience Research Australia
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_132864] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nuclear protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) is found in cytoplasmic inclusions in a subset of patients with the neurodegenerative disorder frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD-FUS). FUS contains a methylated arginine-glycine-glycine domain that is required for transport into the nucleus. Recent findings have shown that this domain is hypomethylated in patients with FTLD-FUS. To determine whether the cause of hypomethylation is the result of mutations in protein N-arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs), we selected 3 candidate genes (PRMT1, PRMT3, and PRMT8) and performed complete sequencing analysis and real-time polymerase chain reaction mRNA expression analysis in 20 FTLD-FUS cases. No mutations or statistically significant changes in expression were observed in our patient samples, suggesting that defects in PRMTs are not the cause of FTLD-FUS. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available