4.5 Article

Higher iron in the red nucleus marks Parkinson's dyskinesia

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 1497-1503

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.025

Keywords

Parkinson's disease (PD); Red nucleus; Transverse relaxation rate (R2*); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS060722, NS082151, ES019672]
  2. Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pennsylvania State University CTSA [UL-1RR033184]
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Health Tobacco Settlement Funds [C06 RR016499]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dopamine cell loss and increased iron in the substantia nigra (SN) characterize Parkinson's disease (PD), with cerebellar involvement increasingly recognized, particularly in motor compensation and levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) development. Because the red nucleus (RN) mediates cerebellar circuitry, we hypothesized that RN iron changes might reflect cerebellum-related compensation, and/or the intrinsic capacity for LID development. We acquired high resolution magnetic resonance images from 23 control and 38 PD subjects (12 with PD and history of LID [PD+DYS]) and 26 with PD and no history of LID (PD-DYS). Iron content was estimated from bilateral RN and SN transverse relaxation rates (R2*). PD subjects overall displayed higher R2* values in both the SN and RN. RN R2* values correlated with off-drug Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-motor scores, but not disease duration or drug dosage. RN R2* values were significantly higher in PD+DYS compared with control and PD-DYS subjects; control and PD-DYS subjects did not differ. The association of higher RN iron content with PD-related dyskinesia suggests increased iron content is involved in, or reflects, greater cerebellar compensatory capacity and thus increased likelihood of LID development. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available