4.5 Article

Changes in subcortical structures in early- versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 1740-1747

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.01.001

Keywords

Alzheimer's Disease; Onset age; Early onset; Subcortical structure; Longitudinal study; Amygdala; Hippocampus; Thalamus; Putamen; Globus pallidus; Caudate nucleus; Basal ganglia

Funding

  1. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A102065]
  2. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) NRL program grant
  3. Korean government (MEST) [2011-0028333]
  4. Samsung Medical Center Clinical Research Development Program grants [CRL-108011, CRS 110-14-1]
  5. Converging Research Center Program through the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010K001054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) are reported to be different from those with late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) in terms of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings. In this study, we aimed to compare the longitudinal volume changes of 6 subcortical structures (the amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, putamen, globus pallidus, and caudate nucleus) between patients with EOAD and LOAD for 3 years. We prospectively recruited 36 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (14 EOAD, 22 LOAD) and 14 normal control subjects. We analyzed the volume of subcortical structures using an automatic surface-based method. At baseline, there were no differences in the volumes of subcortical structures between patients with EOAD and LOAD. However, over 3 years of longitudinal follow-up, patients with EOAD showed more rapid volumetric decline in the caudate, putamen, and thalamus than patients with LOAD, which is consistent with neuropsychological results. Our findings suggested that the cognitive reserve theory might be applicable to explain different decline rates of the volumes of the basal ganglia and thalamus according to onset age. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available