4.5 Article

Longitudinal measures of cholinergic forebrain atrophy in the transition from healthy aging to Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 1210-1220

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.018

Keywords

Nucleus basalis of Meynert; Substantia innominata; Cholinergic basal forebrain; MRI; Voxel-based morphometry; VBM; MCI; OASIS; Longitudinal

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Faculty, Department Ageing Science and Humanities, University of Rostock
  2. Hirnliga e. V. (Nurmbrecht, Germany)
  3. Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) [P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, R01 AG021910, P50 MH071616, U24 RR021382, R01 MH56584]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent evidence from cross-sectional in vivo imaging studies suggests that atrophy of the cholinergic basal forebrain (BF) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be distinguished from normal age-related degeneration even at predementia stages of the disease. Longitudinal study designs are needed to specify the dynamics of BF degeneration in the transition from normal aging to AD. We applied recently developed techniques for in vivo volumetry of the BF to serial magnetic resonance imaging scans of 82 initially healthy elderly individuals (60-93 years) and 50 patients with very mild AD (Clinical Dementia Rating score = 0.5) that were clinically followed over an average of 3 +/- 1.5 years. BF atrophy rates were found to be significantly higher than rates of global brain shrinkage even in cognitively stable healthy elderly individuals. Compared with healthy control subjects, very mild AD patients showed reduced BF volumes at baseline and increased volume loss over time. Atrophy of the BF was more pronounced in progressive patients compared with those that remained stable. The cholinergic BF undergoes disproportionate degeneration in the aging process, which is further increased by the presence of AD. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available