4.5 Article

Ante mortem amyloid imaging and β-amyloid pathology in a case with dementia with Lewy bodies

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 878-885

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.08.007

Keywords

Dementia with Lewy bodies; Amyloid imaging; PET; Pathology; Amyloid

Funding

  1. Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award in Aging [K23-AG030935, P50-AG16574/Project1, P30-AG010161, RO 1-AG15866, R01-AG11378]
  2. Alexander family
  3. Robert H. And Clarice Smith and Abigail van Buren Alzheimer's Disease Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The association between ante mortem [C-11]-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) retention and beta-amyloid (A beta) load, Lewy body (LB) and neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) densities were investigated in a pathologically confirmed case of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). A 76 year old man presenting with a clinical diagnosis of DLB had undergone PiB-positron emission tomography (PET), F-18 FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 18 months before death. The pathologic diagnosis was DLB neocortical-type with low-likelihood of Alzheimer's disease by NIA-Reagan criteria. Sections from regions of interest (ROI) on post-mortem examination were studied. A significant correlation was found between cortical A beta density and PiB retention in the 17 corresponding ROIs (r = 0.899; p < 0.0001). Bielschowsky silver stain revealed mostly sparse neocortical neuritic plaques, whereas diffuse plaques were frequent. There was no correlation between LB density and PiB retention (r = 0.13; p = 0.66); nor between NFT density and PiB retention (r = -0.36; p = 0.17). The ROI-based analysis of imaging and histopathological data confirms that PiB uptake on PET is a specific marker for A beta density, but cannot differentiate neuritic from diffuse amyloid plaques in this case with DLB. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available