4.5 Article

Maximal brain size remains an important predictor of cognition in old age, independent of current brain pathology

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 1758-1768

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.017

Keywords

Cognition; Cognitive impairment; MRI; Cognitive reserve

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, USA [AG021511, AG10220, AG031563, AG10129]
  2. California Department of Public Health Alzheimer's Disease Program [09-11406, 09-11407]
  3. Northern California VA Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is growing interest in the influence of early-life development on clinical manifestations of late-life diseases. Latent variable modeling was used to investigate how maximal brain volume (measured by intracranial volume [ICV]) and current brain volumes uniquely contribute to domain-specific cognitive performance in a group of 401 cognitively and ethnically diverse older adults. Individual effects of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures including ICV were examined as predictors of episodic memory, semantic memory, spatial ability, and executive function. Total brain matter volume related to all cognitive domains; hippocampal volume was associated primarily with episodic memory; white matter hyperintensity volume was related to executive function and episodic memory. Maximal brain size as measured by ICV was related to semantic memory, executive function, and spatial ability independent of current brain volumes (ps < 0.01). Relationships between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) variables and cognition did not differ substantially across groups defined by ethnicity, gender, and with minor exceptions, clinical diagnosis. Results suggest maximal brain development and measures of brain injury/atrophy jointly contribute to cognitive function in older people. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available