4.5 Article

Melatonin reduces membrane rigidity and oxidative damage in the brain of SAMP8 mice

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 2045-2054

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.013

Keywords

Aging; Melatonin; Oxidative stress; Membrane fluidity; Mitochondria; Senescence-accelerated mice

Funding

  1. Gobierno de Aragon (Aging and Oxidative Stress Physiology) [B40]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [P07-CTS-03135]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RD06/0013/0008, RD06/0013/0011, RD06/0013/1017, PI08-1644]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the autophagy-lysosomal pathway and membrane fluidity in brain cells and mitochondrial membranes obtained from senescence-accelerated (SAMP(8)) and senescence-resistant (SAMR(1)) mice at 5 and 10 months of age. Moreover, we studied whether chronic treatment from age 1 to 10 months with melatonin stabilizes membrane fluidity. Fluidity was measured by polarization changes of 1-(4-trimethylammoniumpheny1)-6-phenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene-p-toluene sulfonate. Results showed that in untreated animals at 5 months of age, synaptosomal and mitochondrial fluidity was decreased in SAMP(8) compared to SAMR(1), as was the cathepsin D/B ratio, indicating dysfunction of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway. Moreover, we detected synaptosomal rigidity and programmed cell death capability in both groups at 10 months of age. Mitochondrial fluidity, however, did not show a significant age-dependent change but was lower in SAMP(8) than in SAMR(1) at the 5- and 10-month time points. Melatonin administration prevented rigidity in the mitochondrial membrane and seemed to decrease age-related autophagy-lysosomal alterations. These data suggest that melatonin may act to slow down the aging process because of its ability to enhance membrane fluidity and maintain structural pathways. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available