4.5 Article

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing genes and cerebrospinal fluid APP cleavage product levels in Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.10.020

Keywords

APP; ADAM10; BACE1; BACE2; PSEN1; PSEN2; PEN2; NCSTN; APH1B; Alzheimer's; Cerebrospinal fluid

Funding

  1. US Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. Biomedical Laboratory
  3. NIH [1K99AGO34214-01A1, 2P50AG005136-27, 1P50NS062684-01A1]
  4. University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research Center NIH [NIH P50-AG005136]
  5. University of California, San Diego Alzheimer's disease Research Center [P50AGOO5131-27]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this exploratory investigation was to determine if genetic variation within amyloid precursor protein (APP) or its processing enzymes correlates with APP cleavage product levels: APP alpha, APP beta or A beta 42, in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of cognitively normal subjects or Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Cognitively normal control subjects (n = 170) and AD patients (n = 92) were genotyped for 19 putative regulatory tagging SNPs within 9 genes (APP, ADAM10, BACE1, BACE2, PSEN1, PSEN2, PEN2, NCSTN and APH1B) involved in the APP processing pathway. SNP genotypes were tested for their association with CSF APP alpha, APP beta, and A beta 42. AD risk and age-at-onset while taking into account age, gender, race and APOE epsilon 4. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, a significant association was found between ADAM10 SNP rs514049 and APP alpha levels. In controls, the rs514049 CC genotype had higher APP alpha levels than the CA, AA collapsed genotype, whereas the opposite effect was seen in AD patients. These results suggest that genetic variation within ADAM10, an APP processing gene, influences CSF APP alpha levels in an AD specific manner. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available