4.5 Article

Differential recognition of vascular and parenchymal beta amyloid deposition

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1774-1783

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.11.012

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid beta; Antibody; Histochemistry; Imaging; Immunoreactivity

Funding

  1. IOP Genomics Senter [IGE05005]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AG021084, AG005134]
  3. Centre for Medical Systems Biology within the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By phage display, llama-derived heavy chain antibody fragments were selected from non-immune and immune libraries and tested for their affinity and specificity for beta amyloid by phage-ELISA, immunohistochemistry and surface plasmon resonance. We identified eight distinct heavy chain antibody fragments specific for beta amyloid. While three of them recognized vascular and parenchymal beta amyloid deposits, the remaining five heavy chain antibody fragments recognized vascular beta amyloid specifically, failing to bind to parenchymal beta amyloid. These heavy chain antibody fragments, selected from different libraries, demonstrated differential affinity for different epitopes when used for immunohistochemistry. These observations indicate that the llama heavy chain antibody fragments are the first immunologic probes with the ability to differentiate between parenchymal and vascular beta amyloid aggregates. This indicates that vascular and parenchymal beta amyloid deposits are heterogeneous in epitope presence/availability. The properties of these heavy chain antibody fragments make them potential candidates for use in in vivo differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Continued use and characterization of these reagents will be necessary to fully understand the performance of these immunoreagents. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available