4.5 Article

Incidental Lewy body disease: Do some cases represent a preclinical stage of dementia with Lewy bodies?

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 857-863

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.05.019

Keywords

Incidental Lewy body disease; Parkinson disease; Dementia with Lewy bodies

Funding

  1. Morris K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence [P50 N540256]
  2. NIH [2R01 ES 10751]
  3. Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P50 AG16754]
  4. Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry [U01 AG06786]
  5. Rochester Epidemiology Project [AR30582-43]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lewy pathology occurs in 8-17% of neurologically normal people age >60, termed incidental Lewy body disease (iLBD). It is often assumed to represent preclinical Parkinson disease (PD). However, some iLBD cases have diffuse pathology inconsistent with preclinical PD. We analyzed iLBD cases (alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry) using the Braak PD staging scheme and determined if some had a neuropathological pattern suggestive of preclinical dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Of the 235 brains examined, 34 had iLBD (14.5%) and all but one could be assigned a Braak PD stage. The distribution of alpha-synuclein pathology in the 33 cases fell into three patterns: (1) diffuse cortical and subcortical alpha-synuclein pathology; (2) no cortical alpha-synuclein pathology, but a caudal-to-rostral ascending pattern, primarily involving brainstem; and (3) intermediate between these two categories. Also, 6/33 cases failed to follow the pattern of contiguous spread proposed by Braak. These findings suggest dichotomy in the distribution of iLBD: some cases fit the Braak ascending scheme, conceptually consistent with preclinical PD, whereas others displayed prominent cortical involvement that might represent preclinical DLB. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available