4.5 Article

The effect of midlife physical activity on structural brain changes in the elderly

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 1927-1936

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.10.007

Keywords

Physical activity; Magnetic resonance imaging; WML; Brain volume; Voxel-based morphometry

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of the Academy of Finland [41474, 121038]
  2. EVO [5510, 477270]
  3. Academy of Finland [103334, 120676, 206951]
  4. Juho Vainio Foundation
  5. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation
  6. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [121038, 206951, 103334, 103334, 206951, 121038] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical activity has been associated with decreased dementia risk in recent studies, but the effects for structural brain changes (i.e. white matter lesions (WML) and/or brain atrophy) have remained unclear. The CAIDE participants were a random population-based sample studied in midlife and re-examined on average 21 years later (n = 2000). A subpopulation (n = 75; 31 control, 23 MCI, 21 dementia) was MRI scanned at the re-examination. T1-weighted images were used to investigate grey matter (GM) density, and FLAIR-images for WML rating. Persons who actively participated in physical activity at midlife tended to have larger total brain volume (beta 0.12; 95% CI 0.17-1.16, p=0.10) in late-life than sedentary persons even after adjustments. GM volume was larger among the active (beta 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-1.48, p=0.03), whereas the association between midlife physical activity and larger WM volume became non-significant (beta 0.03; 95% CI -0.64 to 0.86, p=0.77) after full adjustments. The differences in the GM density localized mainly in frontal lobes. There was no significant association between midlife physical activity and severe WML later in life after full adjustments (OR 4.20, 95% CI 0.26-69.13, p= 0.32). (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available