4.5 Article

Boosting power for clinical trials using classifiers based on multiple biomarkers

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 1429-1442

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.022

Keywords

Clinical trial enrichment; Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroimaging; Biomarkers; Classification; Support vector machines

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  2. National Institute on Aging
  3. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine learning methods pool diverse information to perform computer-assisted diagnosis and predict future clinical decline. We introduce a machine learning method to boost power in clinical trials. We created a Support Vector Machine algorithm that combines brain imaging and other biomarkers to classify 737 Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) subjects as having Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or normal controls. We trained our classifiers based on example data including: MRI measures of hippocampal, ventricular, and temporal lobe volumes, a PET-FDG numerical summary, CSF biomarkers (t-tau, p-tau, and A beta(42)), ApoE genotype, age, sex, and body mass index. MRI measures contributed most to Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification; PET-FDG and CSF biomarkers, particularly A beta(42), contributed more to MCI classification. Using all biomarkers jointly, we used our classifier to select the one-third of the subjects most likely to decline. In this subsample, fewer than 40 AD and MCI subjects would be needed to detect a 25% slowing in temporal lobe atrophy rates with 80% power-a substantial boosting of power relative to standard imaging measures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available