4.5 Review

Blood-brain barrier: Ageing and microvascular disease-systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 337-352

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.07.015

Keywords

Ageing; Alzheimer's disease; Blood-brain barrier; Cerebral circulation; Cerebrovascular disorders; Dementia; Microcirculation; Stroke; Vascular disease; White-matter disease

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0700704B] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerebral microvascular disease occurs in lacunar stroke, leukoaraiosis, vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease. It may arise from or contribute to insidious damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We systematically reviewed the literature for evidence that BBB permeability is altered in patients with manifestations of cerebral microvascular disease. We found 31 BBB permeability studies (1953 individuals) of normal ageing or cerebral microvascular disease. In healthy humans, increasing age (10 comparisons, controls(C): subjects(S) = 357:336) was associated with increased BBB permeability (standardised mean difference (S.M.D.) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60, 1.81, p < 0.01). BBB permeability was increased further inpatients with either vascular or Alzheimer's dementia compared with age-matched controls (26 comparisons, C:S = 510:547, S.M.D). 0.81, 99% CI 0.37, 1.26, p < 0.01); in vascular compared with Alzheimer's dementia (10 comparisons, C:S = 291:165, S.M.D. 0.71, 99% CI 0.12, 1.29, p < 0.01); and with worsening leukoaraiosis (5 comparisons,C:S = 122:88, S.M.D. 0.60, 99%CI 0.30, 0.89, p < 0.01). BBB permeability increases with normal ageing and maybe an important mechanism in the initiation or worsening of cerebral microvascular disease. Further studies on the role of BBB permeability are urgently needed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available