4.5 Article

PET imaging of the in vivo brain acetylcholinesterase activity and nicotine binding in galantamine-treated patients with AD

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1204-1217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.02.020

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; acetylcholinesterase; C-11-nicotine binding; positron emission tomography (PET); cerebrospinal fluid; plasma; cognitive function; attention; galantamine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of galantamine treatment on cortical acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and nicotinic receptor binding was investigated by positron emission tomography (PET) in 18 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) in relation to galantamine concentration and the patients' cognitive performances. The first 3 months of the study was of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, during which 12 patients received galantamine (16-24 mg/day) and 6 patients the placebo, and this was followed by 9 months' galantamine treatment in all patients. The patients underwent PET examinations to measure cortical AChE activity (C-11-PMP) and C-11-nicotine binding. Neuropsychological tests were performed throughout the study. Inhibition (30-40%) of cortical AChE activity was observed after 3 weeks to 12 months of galantamine treatment. No significant change in mean cortical C-11-nicotine binding was observed during the study. C-11-Nicotine binding, however, positively correlated with plasma galantamine concentration. Both the changes of AChE activity and C-11-nicotine binding correlated positively with the results of a cognitive test of attention. In conclusion, galantamine caused sustained AChE inhibition for up to 12 months. At the individual level, the in vivo cortical AChE inhibition and C-11-nicotine binding were associated with changes in the attention domain of cognition rather than episodic memory. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available