4.6 Article

N2M2 (NOA-20) phase I/II trial of molecularly matched targeted therapies plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-MGMT hypermethylated glioblastoma

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 95-105

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy161

Keywords

CD95 ligand; MDM2; MGMT; mTOR; radiotherapy

Funding

  1. DKFZ/NCT Heidelberg
  2. German Cancer Aid (DKH) [70111980]
  3. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  4. Heidelberg Center for Personalized Oncology [HIPO 2-K25, 2-K32R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Patients with glioblastoma without O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation are unlikely to benefit from alkylating chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). Trials aiming at replacing TMZ with targeted agents in unselected patient populations have failed to demonstrate any improvement of survival. Advances in molecular understanding and diagnostic precision enable identification of key genetic alterations in a timely manner and in principle allow treatments with targeted compounds based on molecular markers. Methods The NCT Neuro Master Match ((NM2)-M-2) trial is an open-label, multicenter, phase I/IIa umbrella trial for patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastoma without MGMT promoter hypermethylation to show safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of treatment with targeted compounds in addition to standard radiotherapy based on molecular characterization. (NM2)-M-2 is formally divided into a Discovery and a Treatment part. Discovery includes broad molecular neuropathological diagnostics to detect predefined biomarkers for targeted treatments. Molecular diagnostics and bioinformatic evaluation are performed within 4 weeks, allowing a timely initiation of postoperative treatment. Stratification for Treatment takes place in 5 subtrials, including alectinib, idasanutlin, palbociclib, vismodegib, and temsirolimus as targeted therapies, according to the best matching molecular alteration. Patients without matching alterations are randomized between subtrials without strong biomarkers using atezolizumab and asinercept (APG101) and the standard of care, TMZ. For the phase I parts, a Bayesian criterion is used for continuous monitoring of toxicity. In the phase II trials, progression-free survival at 6 months is used as endpoint for efficacy. Results Molecular diagnostics and bioinformatic evaluation are performed within 4 weeks, allowing a timely initiation of postoperative treatment. Stratification for Treatment takes place in 5 subtrials, including alectinib, idasanutlin, palbociclib, vismodegib, and temsirolimus as targeted therapies, according to the best matching molecular alteration. Patients without matching alterations are randomized between subtrials without strong biomarkers using atezolizumab and asinercept (APG101) and the standard of care, TMZ. For the phase I parts, a Bayesian criterion is used for continuous monitoring of toxicity. In the phase II trials, progression-free survival at 6 months is used as endpoint for efficacy. Discussion Molecularly informed trials may provide the basis for the development of predictive biomarkers and help to understand and select patient subgroups who will benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available