4.6 Article

MRI biomarkers identify the differential response of glioblastoma multiforme to anti-angiogenic therapy

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 868-879

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou040

Keywords

anti-angiogenic therapies; glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); MRI biomarker

Funding

  1. RAZCER (Rapid Astrazeneca and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Evaluation of Radio-modifiers)
  2. Brain Child
  3. Brain Tumor Foundation of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although anti-angiogenic therapy (AATx) holds great promise for treatment of malignant gliomas, its therapeutic efficacy is not well understood and can potentially increase the aggressive recurrence of gliomas. It is essential to establish sensitive, noninvasive biomarkers that can detect failure of AATx and tumor recurrence early so that timely adaptive therapy can be instituted. We investigated the efficacy of MRI biomarkers that can detect response to different classes of AATxs used alone or in combination with radiation. Murine intracranial glioma xenografts (NOD/SCID) were treated with sunitinib, VEGF-trap or B20 (a bevacizumab equivalent) alone or in combination with radiation. MRI images were acquired longitudinally before and after treatment, and various MRI parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient, T(1)w + contrast, dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE], initial area under the contrast enhancement curve, and cerebral blood flow) were correlated to tumor cell proliferation, overall tumor growth, and tumor vascularity. Combinatorial therapies reduced tumor growth rate more efficiently than monotherapies. Apparent diffusion coefficient was an accurate measure of tumor cell density. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-trap or B20, but not sunitinib, resulted in significant reduction or complete loss of contrast enhancement. This reduction was not due to a reduction in tumor growth or microvascular density, but rather was explained by a reduction in vessel permeability and perfusion. We established that contrast enhancement does not accurately reflect tumor volume or vascular density; however, DCE-derived parameters can be used as efficient noninvasive biomarkers of response to AATx. MRI parameters following therapy vary based on class of AATx. Validation of clinically relevant MRI parameters for individual AATx agents is necessary before incorporation into routine practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available