4.6 Article

Clinical and prognostic features of adult patients with gangliogliomas

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 409-413

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not169

Keywords

adults; ganglioglioma; malignant transformation; progression; treatment

Funding

  1. Sanofi-Aventis
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. EMD-Serono

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Gangliogliomas (GGs) represent <1% of primary brain tumors in adults. Little is known regarding prognostic features, clinical characteristics, or the impact of treatment on patient outcomes. Methods. Our neuro-oncology longitudinal database was screened for patients with GG from 1992 to 2012. Sixty-seven patients (age > 18 y) were identified. Results. Sixty-two patients presented with low-grade GG and 5 with anaplastic GG. The median age at diagnosis was 29 years. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years after the initial diagnosis, 23 patients had progressive disease. Range of time to progression was 0.2-20 years. Nine patients with low-grade GG progressed to a malignant tumor. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was not reached. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year OS for patients with low-grade GG were 100%, 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%, 95%), and 84% (95% CI: 67%, 93%), respectively. Factors identified by univariate analysis that were significantly associated with OS were age, KPS, extent of resection (EOR), and grade. Factors on univariate analysis that were significantly associated with progression-free survival were grade and EOR. On multicovariate Cox regression, lower tumor grade and younger age were significant factors for longer OS. EOR is a significant factor for progression-free survival. Conclusions. While GG has excellent prognosis, malignant histologic grade, older age, and diagnosis with biopsy could indicate worse prognosis. The late nature and high rate of progression emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up. The role of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for incompletely resected low-grade GG remains unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available