4.6 Article

Pseudoprogression after high-dose busulfan-thiotepa with autologous stem cell transplantation and radiation therapy in children with brain tumors: Impact on survival

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 1413-1421

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos212

Keywords

brain tumor; busulfan; child; pseudoprogression; radiation therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Children with a brain tumor treated with high-dose busulfan-thiotepa with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and radiation therapy (RT) often experience radiographic changes during follow-up. The purpose of the study was to identify the incidence, time course, risk factors, and clinical outcome of this complication. From May 1988 through May 2007, 110 patients (median age, 3.6 years; range, 1 month to 15.3 years) with a brain tumor had received 1 course of high-dose busulfan-thiotepa with stem cell rescue, followed or preceded by RT as part of their treatment. All MRI follow-up examinations were systematically reviewed. Twenty-three patients (21) developed neuroradiological abnormalities at a median time of 9.2 months (range, 5.617.3 months) after ASCT. All contrast-enhancing lesions appeared in patients who had received RT after ASCT and were localized inside the 5055Gy isodoses. They disappeared in 14 of 23 patients after a median time of 8 months (range, 317 months), leaving microcalcifications in some cases. The presence of MRI abnormalities was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95 confidence interval [CI], 0.040.33), with a 5-year overall survival rate of 84 among patients with MRI abnormalities (95 CI, 6294), compared with 27 (95 CI, 1937) among those without lesions. MRI-detectable pseudoprogression is a common early finding in children treated with high-dose busulfan-thiotepa followed by radiation therapy and is correlated with a better outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available