4.6 Article

Estimated clinical benefit of protecting neurogenesis in the developing brain during radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma

Journal

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 882-889

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos120

Keywords

CNS; medulloblastoma; neurocognitive sparing; radiotherapy; risk modeling

Funding

  1. Danish Child Cancer Foundation
  2. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's scientific fund 2 [vet2-43/2010 ref 256]
  3. Sahlgrenska University Hospital's foundations [5889 act 8181]
  4. Jubileumskliniken's anti-cancer research fund [2006:10]
  5. National Cancer Institute [2P30 CA 014520-34]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to assess the feasibility and estimate the benefit of sparing the neurogenic niches when irradiating the brain of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma (MB) based on clinical outcome data. Pediatric MB survivors experience a high risk of neurocognitive adverse effects, often attributed to the whole-brain irradiation that is part of standard management. Neurogenesis is very sensitive to radiation, and limiting the radiation dose to the hippocampus and the subventricular zone (SVZ) may preserve neurocognitive function. Radiotherapy plans were created using 4 techniques: standard opposing fields, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT), and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Mean dose to the hippocampus and SVZ (mean for both sites) could be limited to 88.3 (range, 83.691.0), 77.1 (range, 71.581.3), and 42.3 (range, 26.651.2) with IMAT, IMRT, and IMPT, respectively, while maintaining at least 95 of the prescribed dose in 95 of the whole-brain target volume. Estimated risks for developing memory impairment after a prescribed dose of 23.4 Gy were 47 (95 confidence interval [CI], 2169), 44 (95 CI, 2165), 41 (95 CI, 2260), and 33 (95 CI, 2344) with opposing fields, IMAT, IMRT, and IMPT, respectively. Neurogenic niche sparing during cranial irradiation of pediatric patients with MB is feasible and is estimated to lower the risks of long-term neurocognitive sequelae. Greatest sparing is achieved with intensity-modulated proton therapy, thus making this an attractive option to be tested in a prospective clinical trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available