4.6 Article

Preconditioning crush increases the survival rate of motor neurons after spinal root avulsion

Journal

NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 540-548

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.130096

Keywords

nerve regeneration; nerve root avulsion; spinal nerve root; heat shock protein 27; nitric oxide synthase; motor neurons; fluorescent antibody technique; choline acetyltransferase; a grant from Education Ministry of Jiangsu Province; Excellent Discipline of Jiangsu Province; neural regeneration

Funding

  1. Education Ministry of Jiangsu Province [08KJB310002]
  2. Excellent Discipline of Jiangsu Province [JX10131801096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a previous study, heat shock protein 27 was persistently upregulated in ventral motor neurons following nerve root avulsion or crush. Here, we examined whether the upregulation of heat shock protein 27 would increase the survival rate of motor neurons. Rats were divided into two groups: an avulsion-only group (avulsion of the L-4 lumbar nerve root only) and a crush-avulsion group (the L-4 lumbar nerve root was crushed 1 week prior to the avulsion). Immunofluorescent staining revealed that the survival rate of motor neurons was significantly greater in the crush-avulsion group than in the avulsion-only group, and this difference remained for at least 5 weeks after avulsion. The higher neuronal survival rate may be explained by the upregulation of heat shock protein 27 expression in motor neurons in the crush-avulsion group. Furthermore, preconditioning crush greatly attenuated the expression of nitric oxide synthase in the motor neurons. Our findings indicate that the neuroprotective action of preconditioning crush is mediated through the upregulation of heat shock protein 27 expression and the attenuation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase upregulation following avulsion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available