4.5 Article

The Neuronal Replicator Hypothesis

Journal

NEURAL COMPUTATION
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 2809-2857

Publisher

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00031

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hungarian National Office for Research and Technology [NAP 2005/KCKHA005]
  2. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [NK73047]
  3. eFlux FET-OPEN [225167]
  4. Marie Curie Inter-European Grant
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U117573805] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MC_U117573805] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose that replication (with mutation) of patterns of neuronal activity can occur within the brain using known neurophysiological processes. Thereby evolutionary algorithms implemented by neuronal circuits can play a role in cognition. Replication of structured neuronal representations is assumed in several cognitive architectures. Replicators overcome some limitations of selectionist models of neuronal search. Hebbian learning is combined with replication to structure exploration on the basis of associations learned in the past. Neuromodulatory gating of sets of bistable neurons allows patterns of activation to be copied with mutation. If the probability of copying a set is related to the utility of that set, then an evolutionary algorithm can be implemented at rapid timescales in the brain. Populations of neuronal replicators can undertake a more rapid and stable search than can be achieved by serial modification of a single solution. Hebbian learning added to neuronal replication allows a powerful structuring of variability capable of learning the location of a global optimum from multiple previously visited local optima. Replication of solutions can solve the problem of catastrophic forgetting in the stability-plasticity dilemma. In short, neuronal replication is essential to explain several features of flexible cognition. Predictions are made for the experimental validation of the neuronal replicator hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available