4.7 Article

Methods for estimating temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter based on incubation data: A comparative evaluation

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 127-135

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.005

Keywords

Data assimilation; Decay rate; Ecological model; MCMC; Residence time; Temperature sensitivity

Categories

Funding

  1. United States Department of Energy, Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences [DE-SC0008270]
  2. Biological Systems Research on the Role of Microbial Communities in Carbon Cycling Program [DE-SC0004601, DE-SC0010715]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the temperature sensitivity (Q(10)) of soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition has been widely studied, the estimate substantially depends on the methods used with specific assumptions. Here we compared several commonly used methods (i.e., one-pool (1P) model, two-discrete-pool (2P) model, three-discrete-pool (3P) model, and time-for-substrate (T4S) Qui method) plus a new and more process oriented approach for estimating Q(10) of SOM decomposition from laboratory incubation data to evaluate the influences of the different methods and assumptions on Q(10) estimation. The process-oriented approach is a three-transfer-pool (3PX) model that resembles the decomposition sub-model commonly used in Earth system models. The temperature sensitivity and other parameters in the models were estimated from the cumulative CO2 emission using the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique. The estimated Q(10)s generally increased with the soil recalcitrance, but decreased with the incubation temperature increase. Our results indicated that the 1P model did not adequately simulate the dynamics of SOM decomposition and thus was not adequate for the Q(10) estimation. All the multi-pool models fitted the soil incubation data well. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) analysis suggested that the 2P model is the most parsimonious. As the incubation progressed, Q(10) estimated by the 3PX model was smaller than those by the 2P and 3P models because the continuous C transfers from the slow and passive pools to the active pool were included in the 3PX model. Although the T4S method could estimate the Q(10) of labile carbon appropriately, our analyses showed that it overestimated that of recalcitrant SOM. The similar structure of 3PX model with the decomposition sub-model of Earth system models provides a possible approach, via the data assimilation techniques, to incorporate results from numerous incubation experiments into Earth system models. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available