4.7 Article

Soil microbial communities vary as much over time as with chronic warming and nitrogen additions

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 19-24

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.013

Keywords

Warming; Nitrogen fertilization; Phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA); Microbial biomass; Microbial community composition; Seasonal; Interannual

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF Ecosystem Studies grant [DEB-0447967]
  2. NSF Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) Program
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1456610] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1237491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effects of simultaneous warming and N additions on soil microbial biomass and community composition and assessed how the microbial community varied over seasonal and interannual timescales. The research took place at the Soil Warming and Nitrogen Addition (SWaN) Study at the Harvard Forest Long Term Ecological Research site. Nitrogen additions suppressed total biomass while warming increased biomass and shifted microbial community fingerprint. However, these responses were inconsistent over time, and seasonal and interannual differences in the microbial community were equal to or greater than treatment effects. For example, microbial biomass in ambient soils was 400% higher in 2008 than in 2010. This was comparable to the 524% difference in biomass between ambient and N addition plots in October, 2008. Our findings suggest that microbial communities can resist increased temperatures and N inputs for years to decades and that long term experiments are necessary to detect significant shifts in biomass and community composition. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available