4.7 Article

Changes in temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in the phases of a three-year crop rotation system

Journal

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 139-146

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.02.002

Keywords

Soil respiration; Soil temperature; Soil moisture; Winter wheat; Millet; Pea

Categories

Funding

  1. Special Fund for the Agricultural Profession [201103039]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05050504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration (Q(10)) and its controlling factors plays an important role in accurately estimating soil respiration and carbon cycling in agro-ecosystems. This manuscript presents a case study on how the Q(10) value for soil respiration changes with soil temperature and moisture in the rotation phases. In a three-year crop rotation system (wheat/wheat/millet/pea) in a semi-arid region of China, the soil respiration rate, temperature and moisture were measured under different crop phases from July 2010 to June 2013. The soil respiration rate was significantly lower in the winter wheat phase (1.63 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) than the millet phase (2.40 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) and pea phase (2.21 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)). However, the Q(10) value was significantly higher in the wheat phase (2.76) than in the millet phase (1.85) and pea phase (1.47). The relationship between the Q(10) values and soil temperature followed an exponential decay function in the rotation system, and the Q-K, value was stable (1.8) with no obvious variation when the temperature exceeded 15 degrees C. The Q(10) value tended to increase with soil moisture until reaching a threshold of 14.7% soil moisture and then declined. Our results indicate that temperature-respiration empirical models should be parameterized according to crop type in the rotation phases, especially when estimating soil respiration in cold-resistant crops under global warming. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available