3.8 Article

Impact of Early Referral to Nephrologist on Mental Health among Hemodialysis Patients: A Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Journal

NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages C191-C197

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000232601

Keywords

Early referral; Mental health; Quality of life; Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study; Hemodialysis

Funding

  1. Kyowa-Hakko Kirin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Pre-dialysis early referral is associated with improved survival in patients on dialysis. Here, we examined the association between pre-dialysis early referral and post-dialysis Mental Health (MH) in hemodialysis patients. Methods: We examined data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), a prospective and observational study of hemodialysis patients, by performing a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of DOPPS data from Japan. The outcome measure was analyzed from the MH subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Item Health Survey. Predictors of mean MH were identified using analysis of covariance. The variables evaluated in the multivariate models included age, sex, duration of dialysis and diabetes. Results: A total of 552 patients under hemodialysis participated in the study, with a late referral prevalence of 34.2% (189/552). The estimated mean MH score was 60.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 57.5-63.8) and 65.6 (95% CI 63.2-68.1) in late and early referrals, respectively. A statistically significant difference in mean MH score of 4.9 was observed between late and early referral groups (p = 0.01). The mean MH score for late referral was significantly lower than that for early referral in the 6-12 and 12-18 month groups. Conclusions: Pre-dialysis early referral is a modifiable and important factor and is associated with improved MH of post-dialysis patients. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available