Journal
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 83-92Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2015.01.012
Keywords
Barley; Canola; Chisel plough; Field pea; Moldboard plough; Reduced tillage; Soil quality; Sustainable agriculture
Categories
Funding
- Federation des producteurs de cultures commerciales du Quebec
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
- Promotion Saguenay
- Ministere des Finances du Quebec (MFEQ) through its program Creneau ACCORD AgroBoreal
- Ministere de l'agriculture, des pecheries et de l'alimentation du Quebec (MAPAQ) division Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean
- Fonds de developpement de l'Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi
- Conference regionale des elus Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean
- Union des Producteurs du Quebec (UPA) division Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the northern agroecosystem of Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, cash crops such as barley, canola, and field pea are gaining popularity over traditional perennial crops like alfalfa. However, very little information is available on the relatively long-term effect of different crop rotations and soil tillage practices on crop yields and soil quality parameters. This study was conducted at the Normandin Research Farm of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Five rotation types [1: Canola-Barley-Barley-Pea (C-B-B-P); 2: Canola-Pea-Barley-Barley (C-P-B-B); 3: Canola-Barley-Pea-Barley (C-B-P-B); 4: Pea monoculture; and 5: Barley monoculture] and two soil tillage practices [1: Chisel plough (CP) and 2; Moldboard plough (MP)] were evaluated. Canola monoculture of was not included. The study began in 1999 on a former alfalfa field and ended in 2010 after three four-year rotation cycles. Barley monoculture decreased yields by 600 kg ha(-1) in the last five years, whereas field pea monoculture decreased yields by about 1000 kg ha(-1) in most years. Barley monoculture did not significantly reduce grain yields compared to CB-B-P and C-P-B-B, highlighting the importance of alternate crops every year. Soil tillage (CP versus MP) did not significantly affect yields for all crops in most years; and when it did have an effect, it showed inconsistencies by either increasing or decreasing grain yields. Soil tillage also had insignificant impact regardless of the rotation type involved. Rotation type and soil tillage had insignificant effect on soil organic matter content, whereas CP increased nitrate and phosphorus content in the 0-20 cm soil layer. Rotation type had insignificant impact on soil physical properties, whereas CP improved soil water conductivity by 0.03 cm h(-1) for C-B-B-P and barley monoculture. Compared to MP, CP improved soil macro-aggregate (2-6 mm) stability to water as well as aggregate mean weight diameter by about 15% for most of the rotations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available