4.6 Article

Phosphate, urea and creatinine clearances: haemodialysis adequacy assessed by weekly monitoring

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 129-136

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu266

Keywords

EKR; equivalent continuous clearance; ECC; haemodialysis adequacy; KT/V; mineral metabolism

Funding

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [N N518 289840]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The specific distribution of phosphate and the control mechanisms for its plasma level makes phosphate kinetics during haemodialysis (HD) considerably different from those of urea and creatinine and makes the quantitative evaluation of adequacy of phosphate removal difficult. We propose the application of equivalent continuous clearance (ECC) as a phosphate adequacy parameter and compare it with ECC for creatinine and urea. Methods. Three consecutive dialysis sessions were evaluated for 25 patients on maintenance HD. Concentrations of phosphate, urea and creatinine in plasma were measured every 1 h during the treatment and 45 min after, and every 30 min in dialysate. ECC was calculated using the removed solute mass assessed in dialysate and weekly solute profile in plasma. Similar calculations were performed also for the midweek dialysis session only. Different versions of the reference concentration for ECC were applied. Results. ECC with peak average reference concentration was 5.4 +/- 1.0 for phosphate, 7.0 +/- 1.0 for urea and 4.7 +/- 1.0 mL/min for creatinine. ECC for urea and creatinine were well correlated in contrast to the correlations of ECC for phosphate versus urea and creatinine. Midweek ECC were higher than weekly ECC, but they were well correlated for urea and creatinine, but only weakly for phosphate. Conclusions. HD adequacy monitoring for phosphate may be performed using ECC, but it is less predictable than similar indices for urea and creatinine. The values of ECC for phosphate are within the range expected for its molecular size compared with those for urea and creatinine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available