4.6 Article

The association between plasma uric acid and renal function decline in a Chinese population-based cohort

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1836-1839

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr597

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; progression; uric acid

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [BMU2009131]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [2006B05]
  3. International Society of Nephrology Research Committee
  4. Beijing Municipal Health Bureau [2009-Z-SQ01]
  5. China Health and Medical Development Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Uric acid may be associated with kidney damage through multiple pathways. Previous cohort studies revealed inconsistent results, and research among the non-hypertensive and non-diabetic population are extremely limited. Methods. This prospective cohort study included 1410 residents aged 59.1 +/- 9.4 years from an urban district of Beijing, China. All participants had an estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73m(2). Plasma uric acid was assessed at baseline; and its relation with renal function decline after 4 years' follow-up was analyzed. Results. During 4 years (5630 person-years) of follow-up, 168 patients (11.9%) developed renal function decline. After adjusting for potential confounders including baseline renal function, plasma uric acid levels were independently associated with an increased risk of renal function decline, with a fully adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.19 [per 1 mg/dL increase; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.38]. Analysis among 615 hypertension-free and diabetes-free participants yielded similar results, with an adjusted OR of 1.50 (per 1 mg/dL increase; 95% CI 1.13-1.98). Conclusion. Our prospective cohort study revealed that plasma uric acid level is independently associated with an increasing likelihood of renal function decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available