4.6 Article

Evolution of renal oxygen content measured by BOLD MRI downstream a chronic renal artery stenosis

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 1205-1210

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq538

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Blood level oxygen dependent; Renal artery stenosis; Renal atrophy; Outer medulla

Funding

  1. AMGEN
  2. University Claude Bernard of Lyon (EZUS)
  3. Societe de Nephrologie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. A decrease in renal oxygen content can be measured non-invasively by the increase of the R2* value derived from blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD MRI). The aim of this study was to test if renal hypoxia occurs in kidneys downstream a chronic and unilateral renal artery stenosis. Methods. Chronic renal ischaemia was induced in rats using a calibrated clip inserted on the right renal artery. R2* was determined, using a multiple recalled gradientecho sequence, before and once a week after a clip insertion over 4 weeks, in a group of clipped (n = 8) and sham-operated (n = 7) rats. Results. At baseline, in stenotic kidneys, R2* was higher in the outer stripe of outer medulla (105 +/- 4.6) and the outer medulla (99 +/- 2.5) than in the cortex (84 +/- 2.5; P < 0.002 for comparison with both areas). R2* was unchanged in the cortex, the outer stripe of outer medulla and the outer medulla in stenotic kidneys, sham-operated kidneys and contralateral kidneys during the 4 weeks. Mean blood pressure was higher in rats with clipped kidney than in sham-operated rats from Day 11 and remained increased thereafter. The renal volume increased progressively in sham-operated kidneys and contralateral kidneys, whereas it slightly decreased in stenotic kidneys. Conclusions. Our study shows that after 4 weeks, no renal hypoxia can be detected in the kidney downstream to a renal artery stenosis, suggesting that atrophy could be induced by other factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available