4.6 Article

Endothelial pro-atherosclerotic response to extracellular diabetic-like environment: Possible role of thioredoxin-interacting protein

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 2141-2149

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp768

Keywords

advanced glycation end-products; diabetes; endothelial cells; thioredoxin-interacting protein

Funding

  1. The Isaac Katzenelenbogen Dermatology Research Fund
  2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
  3. Meir Medical Center Israel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods. Fresh human umbilical vein cord endothelial cells (HUVEC) were treated in the presence of elevated extracellular glucose concentrations (5.5-28 mmol/l) with and without AGE-human serum albumin (HSA). Affymetrix GeneChip (R) Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays were used for gene expression analysis (total 20 chips). Genes of interest were further validated using real-time PCR and western blot techniques. Results. Microarray analysis revealed significant changes in some gene expressions in the presence of the different stimuli, suggesting that different pathways are involved. Six genes were selected for validation as follows: thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), thioredoxin (TXN), nuclear factor of kappa B (NF-kappa B), interleukin 6 (IL6), interleukin 8 (IL8) and receptor of advanced glycation end-products (RAGE). Interestingly, it was found that the association of AGEs together with the highest pathophysiological concentration of glucose (28 mmol/l) diminished the expression of these specific genes, excluding TXN. Conclusions. In the present model that mimics a diabetic environment, the relatively short-term experimental conditions used showed an unexpected blunting action of AGEs in the presence of the highest glucose concentration (28 mmol/l). The interactive cellular pathways involved in these processes should be further investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available