4.6 Article

Regional citrate anticoagulation is safe in intermittent high-flux haemodialysis treatment of children and adolescents with an increased risk of bleeding

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 3337-3342

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq225

Keywords

ACD-A; acute renal failure; children; citrate dialysis; intermittent haemodialysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods. Eighteen children and adolescents aged 5-17 years (median 15 years) underwent 74 iHD treatment sessions with RCA. Twelve of 18 patients presented with overt local or diffuse haemorrhage before beginning the HD sessions, and six had an increased risk of haemorrhagic complications. Forty children on acute haemodialysis with general heparin anticoagulation, matched for bleeding risk, age and body surface area, served as a control group. Citrate 3% solution was begun with 3.3% blood flow rate, and calcium gluconate 10% substitution was started with 0.4% of blood flow rate. Citrate flow was adapted to achieve a post-filter ionized calcium of < 0.30 mmol/L; calcium substitution was adapted to maintain the patients' serum calcium levels within the physiological range. Calcium-free dialysis fluid was used. The blood flow rate ranged from 3 to 5 mL per minute and kilogram body weight. Results. Regional anticoagulation was successfully achieved within the extracorporeal blood circuit, while the coagulation of all 18 patients remained within physiological parameters. No adverse effects of RCA were observed. In all 18 children, neither new haemorrhage nor worsening of the bleeding situation occurred, and in 10/12 patients, bleeding stopped during dialysis with RCA. In contrast, one-third of the control group developed new haemorrhagic complications or presented with worsening of pre-existing bleeding during haemodialysis (P = 0.006). Conclusion. RCA is feasible, safe and effective in paediatric intermittent haemodialysis treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available