4.6 Article

FOXP3-enriched infiltrates associated with better outcome in renal allografts with inflamed fibrosis

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 3847-3854

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp435

Keywords

FOXP3; nodular infiltrates; regulatory T cell; inflamed fibrosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. FOXP3-expressing regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a crucial role in maintaining allogeneic transplant tolerance in experimental models. In clinical transplantation, there are few data about their role in chronic inflammation. We hypothesized that Tregs might accumulate within the graft since enrichment of Tregs has been frequently described in chronically inflamed tissues. Methods. Sixty-seven biopsies, indicated by a rise in creatinine level, were studied. Thirty-four biopsies showing acute T-cell-mediated rejection and 33 displaying inflamed fibrosis were selected. Tregs frequency was calculated for each infiltrate by counting FOXP3+ and CD3+ cells on two contiguous serial sections. Results. A total of 121 infiltrates were scored with a mean of 309 CD3+ cells per infiltrate (range: 50-700). Tregs were enriched within allografts exhibiting inflamed fibrosis versus acute cellular rejection (10.6 +/- 6.8% versus 5.5 +/- 2.6%, respectively, P = 0.005). In those with inflammation within scarred areas, the subset of patients with a low FOXP3/CD3 ratio (below the median value) displayed a lower frequency of B-cell-enriched nodular cell clusters (20% versus 86%, P = 0.001) and had a significantly lower graft survival (log-rank, P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the low FOXP3/CD3 ratio remained an independent indicator of outcome (P = 0.03). Consistently, the FOXP3+/IL-17+ cell ratio was higher in nodular than in diffuse infiltrates. Conclusions. Our results suggest that Tregs may dampen the graft injury in chronic (versus acute) inflammation and stress the importance of devising strategies to enhance Tregs efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available