4.3 Review

Overview of lupus nephritis management guidelines and perspective from Asia

Journal

NEPHROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 11-20

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nep.12136

Keywords

Asia; lupus; nephritis

Funding

  1. Wai Hung Charitable Foundation, Mr G. King
  2. Estate of the late Mr Chan Wing Hei
  3. Astellas Pharma Co. Hong Kong Ltd.
  4. Roche Hong Kong Ltd.
  5. Endowment Fund established for the 'Yu Chiu Kwong Professorship in Medicine' at The University of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and important manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Evidence suggests higher rates of lupus renal involvement in Asian populations, and maybe more severe nephritis, compared with other racial or ethnic groups. The management of LN has evolved considerably over the past three decades, based on observations from clinical studies that investigated different immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, calcineurin inhibitors and novel biologic therapies. This is accompanied by improvements in both the short-term treatment response rate and long-term renal function preservation. Treatment guidelines for LN have recently been issued by rheumatology and nephrology communities in U.S.A. and Europe. In view of the racial difference in disease manifestation and response to therapy, and the substantial disease burden in Asia, a panel of 15 nephrologists and rheumatologists from different Asian regions with extensive experience in lupus nephritis - the Steering Group for the Asian Lupus Nephritis Network (ALNN) - met and discussed the management of lupus nephritis in Asian patients. The group has also reviewed and deliberated on the recently published recommendations from other parts of the world. This manuscript summarizes the discussions by the group and presents consensus views on the clinical management and treatment of adult Asian patients with LN, taking into account both the available evidence and expert opinion in areas where evidence remains to be sought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available