4.3 Article

Neonatal Hyperglycaemia Increases Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm Lambs

Journal

NEONATOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 83-90

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000342240

Keywords

Preterm; Hyperglycaemia; Insulin; Hypoglycaemia; Mortality

Categories

Funding

  1. Auckland Medical Research Foundation
  2. National Research Centre for Growth and Development
  3. Health Research Council of New Zealand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hyperglycaemic preterm babies suffer increased mortality and morbidity, but it is not known if these associations are causal or if treatment with insulin improves outcome. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the effect of neonatal hyperglycaemia, and its treatment with insulin, on mortality and morbidity in preterm lambs. Methods: Preterm lambs (137 days' gestation; term = 148 days) were randomised to a 12-day intravenous infusion of saline (PremC; n = 39), 50% dextrose (HYPER; n = 47), or 50% dextrose + insulin (INS; n = 21). Term controls (TermC; n = 19) received saline. Dextrose and insulin infusions were titrated to maintain blood glucose concentrations (BGC) at 10-12 mmol.l(-1) (HYPER) or 4-6 mmol.l-(1) (INS). Results: HYPER lambs had higher BGC (mean (SEM); TermC: 5.6 (0.1), PremC: 5.5 (0.1), HYPER: 10.8 (0.6), INS: 6.2 (0.3) mmol.l(-1); p < 0.0001), higher mortality (n (%); TermC: 0, PremC: 2 (5), HYPER: 11 (23), INS: 0; p < 0.001), higher incidence of fever (n (%); TermC: 3 (16), PremC: 13 (33), HYPER: 26 (55), INS: 6 (29); p = 0.01) and lower weight gain (mean (SEM); TermC: 45.9 (2.9), PremC: 44.2 (2.1), HYPER: 28.4 (1.9), INS: 28.7 (2.8) g.kg(-1).day(-1); p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Neonatal hyperglycaemia in preterm lambs causes increased mortality and morbidity, and decreases growth. Insulin treatment to restore euglycaemia attenuated the increased mortality and morbidity, but not the decreased growth. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available