4.5 Article

Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation

Journal

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 781-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2616

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [121453-PF-11-178-01-TBE]
  2. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRG 2055-10]
  3. Searle Scholars Program
  4. University of California Berkeley Molecular and Cell Biology Department
  5. US National Institutes of Health [R01-GM094497-01A1]
  6. US National Science Foundation CAREER Program [NSF-MCB-1150288]
  7. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1150288] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1150288] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 26S proteasome is the major eukaryotic ATP-dependent protease, responsible for regulating the proteome through degradation of ubiquitin-tagged substrates. Its regulatory particle, containing the heterohexameric AAA+ ATPase motor and the essential deubiquitinase Rpn11, recognizes substrates, removes their ubiquitin chains and translocates them into the associated peptidase after unfolding, but detailed mechanisms remain unknown. Here we present the 26S proteasome structure from Saccharomyces cerevisiae during substrate degradation, showing that the regulatory particle switches from a preengaged to a translocation-competent conformation. This conformation is characterized by a rearranged ATPase ring with uniform subunit interfaces, a widened central channel coaxially aligned with the peptidase and a spiral orientation of pore loops that suggests a rapid progression of ATP-hydrolysis events around the ring. Notably, Rpn11 moves from an occluded position to directly above the central pore, thus facilitating substrate deubiquitination concomitant with translocation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available