4.5 Article

Association of UHRF1 with methylated H3K9 directs the maintenance of DNA methylation

Journal

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 1155-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2391

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [GM085394, T32CA09156]
  2. NCBC [2010-IDG-I003]
  3. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP110471]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [1097737]
  7. Eli Lilly Canada
  8. Genome Canada
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  11. Novartis Research Foundation
  12. Pfizer
  13. Abbott
  14. Takeda
  15. Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fundamental challenge in mammalian biology has been the elucidation of mechanisms linking DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications. Human UHRF1 (ubiquitin-like PHD and RING finger domain-containing 1) has multiple domains that bind chromatin, and it is implicated genetically in the maintenance of DNA methylation. However, molecular mechanisms underlying DNA methylation regulation by UHRF1 are poorly defined. Here we show that UHRF1 association with methylated histone H3 Lys9 (H3K9) is required for DNA methylation maintenance. We further show that UHRF1 association with H3K9 methylation is insensitive to adjacent H3 S10 phosphorylation-a known mitotic 'phospho-methyl switch'. Notably, we demonstrate that UHRF1 mitotic chromatin association is necessary for DNA methylation maintenance through regulation of the stability of DNA methyltransferase-1. Collectively, our results define a previously unknown link between H3K9 methylation and the faithful epigenetic inheritance of DNA methylation, establishing a notable mitotic role for UHRF1 in this process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available