4.5 Article

Spontaneous occurrence of telomeric DNA damage response in the absence of chromosome fusions

Journal

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 1244-U59

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1725

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [0602009]
  2. Cure Cancer Australia Foundation
  3. American Australian Association
  4. Promina postdoctoral fellowship
  5. Australian Postgraduate Award
  6. Judith Hyam Memorial Trust Fund for Cancer Research
  7. Cancer Council New South Wales program
  8. Office Of The Director
  9. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0602009] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telomere dysfunction is typically studied under conditions in which a component of the six-subunit shelterin complex that protects chromosome ends is disrupted. The nature of spontaneous telomere dysfunction is less well understood. Here we report that immortalized human cell lines lacking wild-type p53 function spontaneously show many telomeres with a DNA damage response (DDR), commonly affecting only one sister chromatid and not associated with increased chromosome end-joining. DDR+ telomeres represent an intermediate configuration between the fully capped and uncapped (fusogenic) states. In telomerase activity-positive (TA(+)) cells, DDR is associated with low TA and short telomeres. In cells using the alternative lengthening of telomeres mechanism (ALT(+)), DDR is partly independent of telomere length, mostly affects leading strand-replicated telomeres, and can be partly suppressed by TRF2 overexpression. In ALT(+) (but not TA(+)) cells, DDR+ telomeres preferentially associate with large foci of extrachromosomal telomeric DNA and recombination proteins. DDR+ telomeres therefore arise through different mechanisms in TA(+) and ALT(+) cells and have different consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available