4.5 Review

The emerging role of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for urogenital cancers

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 688-701

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Prostate Cancer Canada [D2013-21]
  2. Canada Research Chair Program
  3. FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [12/24574-3]
  4. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  5. Swedish Research Council [K2012-52X-09495-25-3]
  6. BIOMATCELL VINN Excellence Center of Biomaterials and Cell Therapy
  7. Stiftelsen Handlanden Hjalmar Svensson Foundation
  8. Magnus Bergvalls Foundation
  9. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) IG [12890]
  10. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/24574-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The knowledge gained from comprehensive profiling projects that aim to define the complex genomic alterations present within cancers will undoubtedly improve our ability to detect and treat those diseases, but the influence of these resources on our understanding of basic cancer biology is still to be demonstrated. Extracellular vesicles have gained considerable attention in past years, both as mediators of intercellular signalling and as potential sources for the discovery of novel cancer biomarkers. In general, research on extracellular vesicles investigates either the basic mechanism of vesicle formation and cargo incorporation, or the isolation of vesicles from available body fluids for biomarker discovery. A deeper understanding of the cargo molecules present in extracellular vesicles obtained from patients with urogenital cancers, through high-throughput proteomics or genomics approaches, will aid in the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, and can potentially lead to the discovery of new therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available