4.6 Article

An objective reduction algorithm using representative Pareto solution search for many-objective optimization problems

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 4881-4895

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-015-1776-4

Keywords

Many-objective optimization; Non-redundant objective set; Conflicting objectives; Objective reduction; Evolutionary algorithm

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [61472297, 61272119, 61402350]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2013JM1007]
  3. Principle Foundation of Xi'an Technological University [XAGDXJJ1232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, many-objective optimization problems (i.e. more than three objectives) have attracted the interests of many researchers. The main difficulties of many-objective optimization problems lie in high computational cost, stagnation in search process, etc. It is almost impossible to design an algorithm effective for all problems. However, for some problems, especially for problems with redundant objectives, it is possible to design effective algorithms by removing the redundant objectives and keeping the non-redundant objectives so that the original problem becomes the one with much fewer objectives. To do so, first, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm-based decomposition is adopted to generate a smaller number of representative non-dominated solutions widely distributed on the Pareto front. Then the conflicting objective pairs are identified through these non-dominated solutions, and the redundant objectives are determined by these pairs and then removed. Based on these, a fast non-redundant objectives generation algorithm is proposed in this paper. Finally, the experiments are conducted on a set of benchmark test problems and the results indicate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available