4.5 Review

Of mice and men: how animal models advance our understanding of T-cell function in RA

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 160-170

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.205

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council of Hungary [ETT 315/2009]
  2. European Union, European Social Fund and Hungary [TAMOP 4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0007]
  3. National Excellence Convergence Program [TAMOP 4.2.1/B-09/1/KONV-2010-0007, TAMOP-4.2.2. A-11/1/KONV-2012-0031]
  4. NIH [R01 AR059356, R01 AR064206, R21 AR062332]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The involvement of autoreactive T cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as well as in autoimmune animal models of arthritis has been well established; however, unanswered questions, such as the role of joint-homing T cells, remain. Animal models of arthritis are superb experimental tools in demonstrating how T cells trigger joint inflammation, and thus can help to further our knowledge of disease mechanisms and potential therapies. In this Review, we discuss the similarities and differences in T-cell subsets and functions between RA and mouse arthritis models. For example, various T-cell subsets are involved in both human and mouse arthritis, but differences might exist in the cytokine regulation and plasticity of these cells. With regard to joint-homing T cells, an abundance of synovial T cells is present in humans compared with mice. On the other hand, local expansion of type 17 T-helper (TH17) cells is observed in some animal models, but not in RA. Finally, whereas T-cell depletion therapy essentially failed in RA, antibody targeting of T cells can work, at least preventatively, in most arthritis models. Clearly, additional human and animal studies are needed to fill the gap in our understanding of the specific contribution of T-cell subsets to arthritis in mice and men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available