4.4 Editorial Material

DSM-5 and RDoC: progress in psychiatry research?

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 810-814

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrn3621

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH079513] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS052819] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroscience studies into psychiatric disorders generally rely on disease definitions that are based on the influential Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the fifth edition of which (DSM-5) was released earlier this year. Designed as a purely diagnostic tool, the DSM considers different disorders as distinct entities. However, boundaries between disorders are often not as strict as the DSM suggests. To provide an alternative framework for research into psychiatric disorders, the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has recently introduced its Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project. In the RDoC, five 'domains' each reflect a brain system in which functioning is impaired, to different degrees, in different psychiatric conditions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience asked six leading investigators for their thoughts on how DSM-5 and the RDoC will influence neuroscience research into psychiatric disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available