4.4 Review

From glutamate co-release to vesicular synergy: vesicular glutamate transporters

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 204-216

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrn2969

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  4. Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
  5. Canadian Research chair
  6. Douglas Mental Health University Institute
  7. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  8. Swedish Research Council
  9. Swedish Brain Foundation
  10. Ahlen Foundation
  11. Wiberg Foundation
  12. National Board of Health and Welfare
  13. Uppsala University, Sweden
  14. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [NRF-3,544]
  15. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  16. Neuroscience Canada
  17. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  18. Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent data indicate that 'classical' neurotransmitters can also act as co-transmitters. This notion has been strengthened by the demonstration that three vesicular glutamate transporters (vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1), VGLUT2 and VGLUT3) are present in central monoamine, acetylcholine and GABA neurons, as well as in primarily glutamatergic neurons. Thus, intriguing questions are raised about the morphological and functional organization of neuronal systems endowed with such a dual signalling capacity. In addition to glutamate co-release, vesicular synergy - a process leading to enhanced packaging of the 'primary' transmitter - is increasingly recognized as a major property of the glutamatergic co-phenotype. The behavioural relevance of this co-phenotype is presently the focus of considerable interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available