4.4 Review

Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 61-69

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrn2773

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Imperial Oil
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [CNE 85117]
  3. NIH/NIMH [9R01MH84282-04A1]
  4. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec
  5. CTV
  6. Globemedia Fellowship
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH084282] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing pressure for neuroscientists to communicate their research and the societal implications of their findings to the public. Communicating science is challenging, and the transformation of communication by digital and interactive media increases the complexity of the challenge. To facilitate dialogue with the public in this new media landscape, we suggest three courses of action for the neuroscience community: a cultural shift that explicitly recognizes and rewards public outreach, the identification and development of neuroscience communication experts, and ongoing empirical research on the public communication of neuroscience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available