4.6 Review

The population genetics of chronic kidney disease: insights from the MYH9-APOL1 locus

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 313-326

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.52

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian and American Technion Societies
  2. Israel Science Foundation [890015, 1227/09]
  3. Legacy Heritage Fund
  4. European Research Commission [MIRG-CT-2007-208019]
  5. IBM
  6. European Commission [205419]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many rare kidney disorders exhibit a monogenic, Mendelian pattern of inheritance. Population-based genetic studies have identified many genetic variants associated with an increased risk of developing common kidney diseases. Strongly associated variants have potential clinical uses as predictive markers and may advance our understanding of disease pathogenesis. These principles are elegantly illustrated by a region within chromosome 22q12 that has a strong association with common forms of kidney disease. Researchers had identified DNA sequence variants in this locus that were highly associated with an increased prevalence of common chronic kidney diseases in people of African ancestry. Initial research concentrated on MYH9 as the most likely candidate gene; however, population-based whole-genome analysis enabled two independent research teams to discover more strongly associated mutations in the neighboring APOL1 gene. The powerful evolutionary selection pressure of an infectious pathogen in West Africa favored the spread of APOL1 variants that protect against a lethal form of African sleeping sickness but are highly associated with an increased risk of kidney disease. We describe the data sources, process of discovery, and reasons for initial misidentification of the candidate gene, as well as the lessons that can be learned for future population genetics research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available