4.6 Review

Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology-multifactorial decision support systems

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 27-40

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.196

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Translational Molecular Medicine framework (AIR FORCE)
  2. European Union
  3. QuIC-ConCePT
  4. Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking
  5. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF UM 2011-5020, KWF UM 2009-4454]
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA143062] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the emergence of individualized medicine and the increasing amount and complexity of available medical data, a growing need exists for the development of clinical decision-support systems based on prediction models of treatment outcome. In radiation oncology, these models combine both predictive and prognostic data factors from clinical, imaging, molecular and other sources to achieve the highest accuracy to predict tumour response and follow-up event rates. In this Review, we provide an overview of the factors that are correlated with outcome-including survival, recurrence patterns and toxicity-in radiation oncology and discuss the methodology behind the development of prediction models, which is a multistage process. Even after initial development and clinical introduction, a truly useful predictive model will be continuously re-evaluated on different patient datasets from different regions to ensure its population-specific strength. In the future, validated decision-support systems will be fully integrated in the clinic, with data and knowledge being shared in a standardized, instant and global manner. Lambin, P. et al. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 27-40 (2013); published online 20 November 2012; doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.196

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available