4.8 Article

Microcapsules for Enhanced Cargo Retention and Diversity

Journal

SMALL
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages 2903-2909

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403175

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-1310266]
  2. Harvard Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-0820484]
  3. Advanced Energy Consortium through the University of Texas, Austin [200700518, BEG08-027]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1310266] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prevention of undesired leakage of encapsulated materials prior to triggered release presents a technological challenge for the practical application of microcapsule technologies in agriculture, drug delivery, and cosmetics. A microfluidic approach is reported to fabricate perfluoropolyether (PFPE)-based microcapsules with a high core-shell ratio that show enhanced retention of encapsulated actives. For the PFPE capsules, less than 2% leakage of encapsulated model compounds, including Allura Red and CaCl2, over a four week trial period is observed. In addition, PFPE capsules allow cargo diversity by the fabrication of capsules with either a water-in-oil emulsion or an organic solvent as core. Capsules with a toluene-based core begin a sustained release of hydrophobic model encapsulants immediately upon immersion in an organic continuous phase. The major contribution on the release kinetics stems from the toluene in the core. Furthermore, degradable silica particles are incorporated to confer porosity and functionality to the otherwise chemically inert PFPE-based polymer shell. These results demonstrate the capability of PFPE capsules with large core-shell ratios to retain diverse sets of cargo for extended periods and make them valuable for controlled release applications that require a low residual footprint of the shell material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available